You are here: ecofinders.dmu.dk Ecosystem Services Regulation of above-ground biodiversity

Regulation of above-ground biodiversity

The last decade has seen an explosion of studies showing that above- and below-ground communities are intimately linked, and that feedbacks between the above- and below-ground subsystems play key roles in controlling ecosystem processes and properties (Wardle, 2002; Wardle et al., 2004; Bardgett et al., 2005; Pivato et al., 2007; van der Heijden et al., 2008). The complexity of possible interactions between above- and below-ground communities, and hence their consequences for ecosystem properties, is enormous (van der Heijden et al., 2008).

Generally, plants regulate the quantity and quality of resources available for the functioning of the decomposer community and for obligate belowground biotrophs, such as root herbivores, pathogens and symbiotic mutualists. In turn, the below-ground community influences plant growth and community dynamics indirectly via the activity of the decomposer food web, which regulates nutrient availability to plants, and directly through the action of root-associated biotrophs (Wardle et al., 2004; van der Heijden et al., 2008; van der Putten et al., 2009). In this way, biotic interactions between above- and below-ground communities act as powerful drivers of plant community dynamics and ecosystem properties, and play a fundamental role in regulating the response of terrestrial ecosystems to human-induced global change.

While it has long been recognised that soil microbes play a pivotal role in the breakdown of organic matter and release of plant growth-limiting nutrients, resulting in strong feedback mechanisms between above and below ground processes, the last decade has seen several major advances in this area. For example, recent recognition of the importance of direct uptake of organic nitrogen by plants has led to a rethinking of the microbial processes that control nitrogen availability to plants (Schimel and Bennett, 2004; Jones et al., 2005). Recent years have also witnessed a growing understanding of the mechanisms by which mycorrhizal fungi can promote plant diversity, for instance by promoting more efficient exploitation and equitable distribution of nutrients within the plant community (Van der Heijden et al., 1998; Maherali and Klironomos, 2007), and of the role that soil pathogens play in regulating vegetation change via negative-feedback processes (Bever et al., 1997; Klironomos, 2002; Bever, 2003; Kardol et al., 2007). Despite these advances, the contribution of soil microbes to plant community dynamics and ecosystem functioning is still poorly understood, largely because over 95% of microbes are unable to be cultured on conventional media. Recent advances in ecological genomics and the use of micro-arrays to detect genes responsible for key ecosystem processes that influence nutrient supply to plants offer potential to overcome this problem, and improve understanding of the roles that soil microbes play in regulating nutrient and plant community dynamics (Van der Heijden et al., 2008).

The soil also hosts an abundant and highly complex community of animals which derive most of their nutrition and carbon either directly from roots and exudates, or indirectly from feeding on microbes (Pollierer et al., 2007). There is much evidence that faunal consumers of microbes can strongly regulate plant nutrient supply and hence plant growth by altering the balance between microbial immobilisation and mineralisation (e.g. Clarholm, 2002; Ingham et al., 1985; Setälä and Huhta, 1991; Bardgett and Chan, 1999). Moreover, larger fauna, such as ecosystem engineers, can substantially modify the temporal and spatial dynamics of plant communities through several mechanisms, including alteration of soil physical structure, transportation of faecal material and propagules, and influencing the movement of water and soluble nutrients (Bardgett, 2005). Another important development is the recognition that root-feeding fauna that selectively feed on particular plant species can alter plant competitive interactions and hence community dynamics (Bradford et al., 2002; De Deyn et al., 2003), and that compositional changes in the soil food web, including changes in the architecture and diversity of soil animal communities (Laakso and Setälä, 1999; Liiri et al., 2002) and broad shifts between fungal and bacterial-based energy channels, have consequences for decomposition and nutrient cycling, and hence plant growth (Wardle et al. 2004; Van der Heijden et al., 2008; Mulder et al., 2009). However, understanding the functional consequences of changes in soil food web composition also requires consideration of environmental context, in that the role of soil biotic interactions relative to abiotic factors in regulating nutrient cycling will vary under different environmental conditions across Europe (Bardgett, 2005). A key aim of EcoFINDERS will be to use a range of experimental approaches to identify the soil biodiversity components that regulate plant diversity and composition across a range of environmental conditions in Europe, and the consequences of feedbacks between above- and below-ground communities for ecosystem services.

Read more in EcoFINDERS publications:

Plant soil interactions alter carbon cycling in an upland grassland soil

Thomson, BC, Ostle, NJ, McNamara, NP, Oakley, S, Whiteley, AS, Bailey, M. Griffiths, RI. 2013. 
Front. Microbiol., 10 September 2013 | doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00253 | Read the article

Soil carbon (C) storage is dependent upon the complex dynamics of fresh and native organic matter cycling, which are regulated by plant and soil-microbial activities. A fundamental challenge exists to link microbial biodiversity with plant-soil C cycling processes to elucidate the underlying mechanisms regulating soil carbon. To address this, we contrasted vegetated grassland soils with bare soils, which had been plant-free for 3 years, using stable isotope (13C) labeled substrate assays and molecular analyses of bacterial communities. Vegetated soils had higher C and N contents, biomass, and substrate-specific respiration rates. Conversely, following substrate addition unlabeled, native soil C cycling was accelerated in bare soil and retarded in vegetated soil; indicative of differential priming effects. Functional differences were reflected in bacterial biodiversity with Alphaproteobacteria andAcidobacteria dominating vegetated and bare soils, respectively. Significant isotopic enrichment of soil RNA was found after substrate addition and rates varied according to substrate type. However, assimilation was independent of plant presence which, in contrast to large differences in 13CO2respiration rates, indicated greater substrate C use efficiency in bare, Acidobacteria-dominated soils. Stable isotope probing (SIP) revealed most community members had utilized substrates with little evidence for competitive outgrowth of sub-populations. Our findings support theories on how plant-mediated soil resource availability affects the turnover of different pools of soil carbon, and we further identify a potential role of soil microbial biodiversity. Specifically we conclude that emerging theories on the life histories of dominant soil taxa can be invoked to explain changes in soil carbon cycling linked to resource availability, and that there is a strong case for considering microbial biodiversity in future studies investigating the turnover of different pools of soil carbon.

Connecting the green and brown worlds: allometric and stoichiometric predictability of above- and below-ground networks

Mulder, C., Arestani, F.S., Bahn, M., Bohan, D.A., Bonkowski, M., Griffiths, B.S., Guicharnaud, R.A., Kattge, J., Krogh, P.H., Lavorel, S., Lewis, O.T., Mancinelli, G., Naeem, S., Peñuelas, J., Poorter, H., Reich, P.B., Rossi, L., Rusch, G.M., Sardans, J. and Wright, I.J. (2013) 
Advances in Ecological Research 49, Ecological Networks in an Agricultural World. Eds Woodward G and Bohan D.A. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Pp. 69-175. Read the chapter

We examine the potential of trait-based parameters of taxa for linking above- and below-ground ecological networks (hereafter ‘green’ and ‘brown’ worlds) to understand and predict community dynamics. This synthesis considers carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus-related traits, the abundance of component species and their size distribution across trophic levels under different forms of management. We have analysed existing and novel databases on plants, microbes and invertebrates that combine physico-chemical and biological information from (agro)ecosystems spanning the globe. We found (1) evidence that traits from above- and below-ground systems may be integrated in the same model and (2) a much greater than expected stoichiometric plasticity of plants and microbes which has implications for the entire food-web mass–abundance scaling. Nitrogen and phosphorus are primary basal resources (hence, drivers) and more retranslocation of P than of N from leaves will lead to higher N:P in the litter and soil organic matter. Thus, under nutrient-rich conditions, higher foliar concentrations of N and P are reflected by lower N:P in the brown litter, suggesting less P retranslocated than N. This apparent stoichiometric dichotomy between green and brown could result in shifts in threshold elemental ratios critical for ecosystem functioning. It has important implications for a general food-web model, given that resource C:N:P ratios are generally assumed to reflect environmental C:N:P ratios. We also provide the first evidence for large-scale allometric changes according to the stoichiometry of agroecosystems. Finally, we discuss insights that can be gained from integrating carbon and nitrogen isotope data into trait-based approaches, and address the origin of changes in Δ13C and Δ15N fractionation values in relation to consumer–resource body-mass ratios.

A Belowground Perspective on Dutch Agroecosystems: How Soil Organisms Interact to Support Ecosystem Services

Mulder, C., Boit, A., Bonkowski, M., De Ruiter, P.C., Mancinelli, G., Van der Heijden, M.G.A., Van Wijnen, H.J., Vonk, J.A., Rutgers, M. 2011.
In: Guy Woodward, Editor(s), Advances in Ecological Research, Academic Press, 2011, Volume 44, Pages 277-357, ISSN 0065-2504, ISBN 9780123747945, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374794-5.00005-5. Read the article

Summary

  1. New patterns and trends in land use are becoming increasingly evident in Europe's heavily modified landscape and else whereas sustainable agriculture and nature restoration are developed as viable long-term alternatives to intensively farmed arable land. The success of these changes depends on how soil biodiversity and processes respond to changes in management. To improve our understanding of the community structure and ecosystem functioning of the soil biota, we analyzed abiotic variables across 200 sites, and biological variables across 170 sites in The Netherlands, one of the most intensively farmed countries. The data were derived from the Dutch Soil Quality Network (DSQN), a long-term monitoring framework designed to obtain ecological insight into soil types (STs) and ecosystem types (ETs).
  2. At the outset we describe STs and biota, and we estimate the contribution of various groups to the provision of ecosystem services. We focused on interactive effects of soil properties on community patterns and ecosystem functioning using food web models. Ecologists analyze soil food webs by means of mechanistic and statistical modelling, linking network structure to energy flow and elemental dynamics commonly based on allometric scaling.
  3. We also explored how predatory and metabolic processes are constrained by body size, diet and metabolic type, and how these constraints govern the interactions within and between trophic groups. In particular, we focused on how elemental fluxes determine the strengths of ecological interactions, and the resulting ecosystem services, in terms of sustenance of soil fertility.
  4. We discuss data mining, food web visualizations, and an appropriate categorical way to capture subtle interrelationships within the DSQN dataset. Sampled metazoans were used to provide an overview of belowground processes and influences of land use. Unlike most studies to date we used data from the entire size spectrum, across 15 orders of magnitude, using body size as a continuous trait crucial for understanding ecological services.
  5. Multimodality in the frequency distributions of body size represents a performance filter that acts as a buffer to environmental change. Large differences in the body-size distributions across ETs and STs were evident. Most observed trends support the hypothesis that the direct influence of ecological stoichiometry on the soil biota as an independent predictor (e.g. in the form of nutrient to carbon ratios), and consequently on the allometric scaling, is more dominant than either ET or ST. This provides opportunities to develop a mechanistic and physiologically oriented model for the distribution of species’ body sizes, where responses of invertebrates can be predicted.
  6. Our results highlight the different roles that organisms play in a number of key ecosystem services. Such a trait-based research has unique strengths in its rigorous formulation of fundamental scaling rules, as well as in its verifiability by empirical data. Nonetheless, it still has weaknesses that remain to be addressed, like the consequences of intraspecific size variation, the high degree of omnivory, and a possibly inaccurate assignment to trophic groups.
  7. Studying the extent to which nutrient levels influence multitrophic interactions and how different land-use regimes affect soil biodiversity is clearly a fruitful area for future research to develop predictive models for soil ecosystem services under different management regimes. No similar efforts have been attempted previously for soil food webs, and our dataset has the potential to test and further verify its usefulness at an unprecedented space scale.

References:

  • Bardgett, R.D., Streeter, T.C., Bol, R. 2003. Soil microbes compete effectively with plants for organic-nitrogen inputs to temperate grasslands. Ecology 84:1277-1287.
  • Bardgett, R.D. 2005. The biology of soil: a community and ecosystem approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Bardgett, R.D., Chan, K.F. 1999. Experimental evidence that soil fauna enhance nutrient mineralisation and plant nutrient uptake in montane grassland ecosystems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31:1007-1014.
  • Bardgett, R.D., Usher, M.B., Hopkins, D.W. 2005. Biological diversity and function in soils. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Bardgett, R.D., Bowman, W.D., Kaufmann, R., Schmidt, S.K. 2005. A temporal approach to linking aboveground and belowground ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:634-641.
  • Bever, J.D. 2003. Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests. New Phytol. 157:465-473.
  • Bever, J.D., Westover, K.M., Antonovics, J. 1997. Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach. J. Ecol. 85:561-573.
  • Bradford, M.A., Jones, T.H., Bardgett, R.D., Black, H.I.J., Boag, B., Bonkowski, M., Cook, R., Eggers, T., Gange, A.C., Grayston, S.J., Kandeler, E., McCaig, A.E., Newington, J.E., Prosser, J.I., Setala, H., Staddon, P.L., Tordoff, G.M., Tscherko, D., Lawton, J.H. 2002. Impacts of soil faunal community composition on model grassland ecosystems. Science 298:615-618.
  • Clarholm, M. 2002. Bacteria and protozoa as integral components of the forest ecosystem, their role in creating a naturally varied soil fertility. Antonie Van Leeuwen Intern. J. Gen. Mol. Microbiol. 81:309-318.
  • De Deyn, G.B., Raaijmakers, C.E., Zoomer, H.R., Berg, M.P., de Ruiter, P.C., Verhoef, H.A., Bezemer, T.M., van der Putten, W.H. 2003. Soil invertebrate fauna enhances grassland succession and diversity. Nature 422:711-713.
  • Ingham, R.E., Trofymow, J.A., Ingham, E.R., Coleman, D.C. 1985. Interactions of bacteria, fungi, and their nematode grazers: effects on nutrient cycling and plant growth. Ecol. Mon. 55:119-140.
  • Jones, D.L., Healey, J.R., Willett, V.B., Farrar, J.F., Hodge, A. 2005. Dissolved organic nitrogen uptake by plants – An important N uptake pathway? Soil Biol. Biochem. 37:413-423.
  • Kardol, P., Cornips, N.J., van Kempen, M.M.L., Bakx-Schotman, J.M.T., van der Putten, W.H. 2007. Microbe-mediated plant-soil feedback causes historical contingency effects in plant community assembly. Ecol. Mon. 77:147-162.
  • Klironomos, J. N. 2002. Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417:67-70.
  • Laakso, J., Setälä, H. 1999. Sensitivity of primary production to changes in the architecture of belowground food webs. Oikos 87:57-64.
  • Liiri, M., Setälä, H., Haimi, J., Pennanen, T., Fritze, H. 2002. Relationship between soil microarthropod species diversity and plant growth does not change when the system is disturbed. Oikos 96:137-149.
  • Maherali, H., Klironomos, J.N. 2007. Influence of phylogeny on fungal community assembly and ecosystem functioning. Science 316:1746-1748.
  • Mulder, C., Den Hollander, H.A., Vonk, A.J., Rossberg, A.G., Jagers op Akkerhuis, G.A.J.M., Yeates, G.W. 2009. Soil resource supply influences faunal size-specific distributions in natural food webs. Naturwissenschaften 96:813-826.
  • Pivato, B., Mazurier, S., Lemanceau, P., Siblot, S., Berta, G., Mougel, C., van Tuinen, D. 2007. Medicago species affect the community composition of arbuscular myccorhizal fungi associated with roots. New Phytol. 176:197-210.
  • Pollierer, M.M., Langel, R., Körner C., Maraun, M., Scheu, S. 2007. The underestimated importance of belowground carbon input for forest soil animal food webs. Ecol. Lett. 10:729-736.
  • Schimel, J.P., Bennett, J. 2004. Nitrogen mineralisation: Challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85:591-602.
  • Setälä, H., Huhta, V. 1991. Soil fauna increase Betula pendula growth: laboratory experiments with coniferous forest floor. Ecology 72:665-671.
  • Van der Heijden, M.G.A., Bardgett, R.D., van Straalen, N.M. 2008. The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11:296-310.
  • Van der Putten, W.H., Bardgett, R.D., de Ruiter, P.C., Hol, W.H.G., Meyer, K.M., Bezemer, T.M., Bradford, M.A., Christensen, S., Eppinga, M.B., Fukami, T., Hemerik, L., Molofsky, J., Schädler, M., Scherber, C., Strauss, S.Y., Vos, M., Wardle, D.A. 2009. Empirical and theoretical challenges in aboveground-belowground ecology. Oecologia 161:1-14.
  • Wardle, D.A. 2002. Communities and ecosystems: linking the aboveground and the belowground components. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
  • Wardle, D.A., Bardgett, R.D., Klironomos, J.N., Setala, H., van der Putten, W.H., Wall, D.H. 2004. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304:1629-1633.
Comments on content: 
Revised 26.06.2014